OBSERVED BLOCKS
—No indexed blocks yetTHE NETWORK, IN PERSPECTIVE
Follow the work.
Understand the concentration.
Block production, payout coordination, and who builds the templates.
Waiting for observations
LARGEST ATTRIBUTED POOL
—Attribution pendingUNKNOWN BLOCK SHARE
—Kept visible, never redistributedTEMPLATE TELEMETRY
—No participating sources yetBLOCK PRODUCTION
Where blocks come from
—blocks observed
Block share estimates mining share over this window. It is not a
live hashrate reading.
CONCENTRATION WATCH
Signals worth a closer look
Crossing a watch level is a concentration signal, not evidence of an attack.
ATTRIBUTION REGISTER
Pool distribution
| Pool / attribution | Blocks | Observed share | 95% interval | Evidence | Rating status |
|---|
Ratings are in draft. “Not assessed” is not a failing grade.
Read the framework →
LATEST OBSERVATIONS
The block feed
FOLLOW THE COINBASE
Payout-address activity
Recipients of block rewards. An address is not automatically a pool or an independent miner.
| Recipient address / script | Blocks appearing in | Coinbase amount (XBT) | Documented role |
|---|
A block may pay multiple recipients. These amounts describe coinbase outputs, not current balances or spendable funds.
SEPARATE POOL SIZE FROM TEMPLATE CONTROL
Who chooses the work?
Cooperating gateways can share difficulty-weighted work and block outcomes.
Template telemetry is not connected
Winning blocks do not reveal every attempted template. We need participating operators to measure template-control share and actual versus expected blocks.
How participation and decentralization ratings work →
01 Identify the template operator02 Measure work, not template counts03 Compare block outcomes
SHOW THE EVIDENCE
What these numbers can tell you
Observed share, with uncertainty
Pool share is attributed blocks divided by all observed blocks in the selected window. Unknown blocks remain in the denominator. The 95% Wilson interval describes sampling uncertainty under an approximately stable block-finding share; it cannot capture attribution mistakes or rapidly changing hashrate.
Attribution is evidence, not identity
Pool tags and documented collection or fee addresses support attribution. Tags can be copied, addresses can rotate, and conflicting matches stay unknown. Ordinary miner payout addresses are never used to infer pool ownership automatically.
Templates are not mining work
Refreshing a template does not add hashrate. Expected blocks are the sum of accepted share difficulty divided by the contemporaneous network difficulty, using the same difficulty convention. Template-control share requires work measurements and operator attribution.
Signals do not prove attacks
Threshold crossings flag concentration. A shortfall in blocks may reflect luck, accounting errors, stale work, or submission failures. Stratum V1 may connect ASICs to a DATUM gateway; a protocol label alone does not establish centralized template control.
Coverage and chain changes
Only the indexed sample is measured. The collector checks the canonical chain and rebuilds its retained window after a detected reorganization. Reorg observations depend on this node's view and are not a complete record of every competing block.
Independent public infrastructure
XBT Pulse reads chain data using a dedicated source. It needs no wallet keys and does not connect to a private mining pool. Telemetry remains unavailable until authenticated participating operators supply it. Sample mode is illustrative and never used for live alerts.